Defeasible Logic with Dynamic Priorities

نویسنده

  • Grigoris Antoniou
چکیده

Defeasible logic is a nonmonotonic reasoning approach based on rules and priorities. Its design supports efficient implementation, and it shows promise to be successfully deployed in applications. So far only static priorities have been used, provided by an external superiority relation. In this paper we show how dynamic priorities can be integrated, where priority information is obtained from the deductive process itself. Dynamic priorities have been studied for other related reasoning systems, such as default logic and argumentation. We define a proof theory, study its formal properties, and provide an argumentation semantics.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the Relationship between Defeasible Logic and Well-Founded Semantics

We investigate in this paper the relationship between an ambiguity propagating defeasible logic recently proposed by Antoniou et al. 3] and well-founded semantics with priorities 6] under a straightforward translation from defeasible theories to extended logic programs. It turns out that a slightly restricted version of defeasible logic is correct wrt well-founded semantics yet incomplete. We a...

متن کامل

A System for

Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents an argument{ based system for defeasible reasoning, with a logic{programming{like language, and based on Dung's argumentation{theoretic approach to the semantics of logic programming. The language of the system has both weak and explicit negation, and connicts between arguments are decided with the help of priorities on the rules. These prioritie...

متن کامل

Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics

We provide a method of translating theories of Nute’s defeasible logic into logic programs, and a corresponding translation in the opposite direction. Under certain natural restrictions, the conclusions of defeasible theories under the ambiguity propagating defeasible logic ADL correspond to those of the well-founded semantics for normal logic programs, and so it turns out that the two formalis...

متن کامل

A System for Nonmonotonic Rules on the Web

Defeasible reasoning is a rule-based approach for efficient reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information. Such reasoning is, among others, useful for ontology integration, where conflicting information arises naturally; and for the modeling of business rules and policies, where rules with exceptions are often used. This paper describes these scenarios in more detail, and reports on th...

متن کامل

Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities

Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a semantics and proof theory of a system for defeasible argumentation. Arguments are expressed in a logic-programming language with both weak and strong negation. Connicts between arguments are decided with the help of priorities on the rules. An important feature of the system is that these priorities are not xed, but are themselves defeasibly d...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Int. J. Intell. Syst.

دوره 19  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002